starlocalnews.comIn The Community, With The Community, For the Community

Your Hometown:


Archives > Little Elm Journal > News

Town’s tax rate jumps 14%

Published: Thursday, September 20, 2007 3:24 PM CDT
Little Elm residents will be paying higher property taxes next year in support of an $11 million budget passed by Town Council at its regular meeting Tuesday night.


Property taxes will increase 14 percent from 47 cents to 53.58 cents per $100 of assessed value, which is above the rollback rate.

All present council members voted in support of the budget and tax increase except Beverly Hughes. Mayor Pro Tem Brenda Mills did not attend the meeting.

“I think that the tax increase is too expensive,” Hughes said. “I think we’ll have to learn to live within our means.”

Hughes also said that she does not believe enough emphasis has been put on public safety and leisure.

Other council members said the tax rate is fair because it still sets Little Elm taxes much lower than many neighboring cities.

“The tax rate we’re proposing is perfectly reasonable,” council member David Hillock said.

The new budget is about $1 million bigger than last year’s. It includes the hiring of an engineer, code enforcement officer, two patrol officers, four parks and recreation employees, and a firefighter.

The budget also will purchase some capital equipment, including a building inspection truck, four fully equipped police Tahoes, Cottonwood Park fencing, and two indestructible laptops for the fire department.

The town allocated more money for personnel this year, as several employees were hired during the year. Last year, the council budgeted to pay them for the part of the year they worked, but this year they will need to be paid for the entire year.

Many departments experienced funding increases, but many of their budgets expanded because a non-departmental fund was abolished. All expenditures that do not correspond to a certain department came out of the non-departmental fund, but this year they have been dispersed throughout the departments.

The facility maintenance fund more than tripled, because expenditures such as electricity payments for all town buildings will now come out of it. The information technology fund also grew substantially because of this change.

Before adopting the new tax rate and budget, the council spent several minutes debating the amended budget for fiscal year 2007. Hughes disapproved of the budget because it fell $243,777 short of keeping the unreserved fund balance at 25 percent of the budget, as recommended in a town resolution.

The end-of-year projection, however, sets the fund balance more than $500,000 above the 25 percent reserve.

“My vote against it was a statement to town staff that we will not in this next year make expenditures over what has been approved without them bringing an ordinance before the council,” Hughes said.

Although he stated that better council budget oversight would have helped during the past year, Hillock said that the responsibility was ultimately up to the council.

“Council spent the money, it’s up to us to adopt the [amendment] ordinance,” he said.

The council discussed the fact that no quarterly or mid-year budget review had been done, which Finance Director Ryan Adams said would have been difficult with a shortage of staff members. The council will likely look over the budget and make corrections at least one time next year.

Share this Article
Bookmark and Share


Article Rating
Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:
Reader Comments
The following are comments from the readers.
In no way do they represent the view of Starlocalnews.com
A.R. wrote on Sep 21, 2007 11:02 AM:
" “The tax rate we’re proposing is perfectly reasonable,” council member David Hillock said. What words of wisdom! Just because the increase is lower than other cities is ridiculous logic. Inflation is 3%, not 14%. Why not use this logic instead? We don't live in Frisco or Plano, we live in L.E. Its very obvious that this council is over their heads when it comes to Finance. The same can be said for City Finance Director Adams. Unbudgeted cost (rebate to Lowes) falls through the cracks because of negligence and ineptness, so now just pass the mistake on to the taxpayors. Bush League talent at best. I guess this takes care of Stephanie Shoemaker's "Christmas List of Goody Projects" she wanted. Yet another fine example of the talent we have on the council. Absolutely no background that would lead one to believe that she is able to balance a budget (without increases). FOLKS, THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. IF YOU DONT HAVE ENOUGH MONEY, YOU NEED TO MAKE CUTS IN SERVICES. THIS WOULD BE THE COURAGEOUS THING TO DO. I guess its time to begin organizing the rollback process. "
Jim wrote on Sep 21, 2007 3:54 PM:
" So what the town council has done is hit us with a 14% tax increase to pay for their mismanagement and budgeting mistakes! That is just GREAT! Instead of "living within a budget" the city just says "o well, let's just soak the taxpayers"! If the city was managed like most households/businesses they wouldn't spend what they don't have! AND WHO GAVE AWAY SALES TAX REVENUE JUST TO GET MERCHANTS TO LOCATE AT THE SW CORNER OF 423 & ELDORADO? You got it: The City of Little Elm! "
mary wrote on Sep 24, 2007 6:35 PM:
" Maybe we folk living on fixed ss can get 14% more so we can afford to continue to live in Little Elm "
Jeff wrote on Sep 29, 2007 11:13 AM:
" Correct, A.R. Little Elm residents, remember this tax increase and your local representative who voted in favor of it when the next local election comes around. Here's another thing: Start saying no to some of these bonds. Example: that big HS football stadium is only fractionally occupied during the football games. What a huge waste of tax money and real estate. "
J wrote on Oct 22, 2007 3:03 PM:
" Look for another round of foreclosures in your neighborhoods... "
Mike wrote on Oct 22, 2007 4:30 PM:
" This council has lost its way. Wow ! 14% is a lot. Do you all get a 14% pay increase. I vote against every bond issue other then infrastructure and police and fire. The old adage is if you give them the money they will spend it. Why grow the budget? why add new items when you cant take care of the old to begin with. Top this off with the legal challenges that will hit the city in the next few years and the 14% will double. It is time government lives the way we all do and be mindful of spending. "
You must register with a valid email to post comments.
Only your Member ID will be posted with the comments.
Registered users sign in here:

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Become a Registered User

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

 
facebook twitter Click here to subscribe to our newspaper
Submit a story Submit a photo Send a Letter
May 2012
Su M Tu W Th F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
Event Date:
May 17th, 2012
Event Time:
7:15am - 10:00pm
Event Date:
May 19th, 2012
Event Time:
6:30am - 2:00pm
Event Date:
May 20th, 2012
Event Time:
6:45am - 9:00am